Tuesday, January 19, 2010

Facebook to charge user is a HOAX, finally!

Read Original

by Nick O'Neill

-Pay Here Image-The ongoing thread that Facebook will soon begin charging for their site doesn’t appear to be slowing. The other night I was having dinner with a family friend who told me about a scoop he had that Facebook would soon begin charging for the site and proceeded to explain why he would pay. While it’s great that Facebook has provided value to his life and millions of others, the company will not charge users to access the site.

Just two weeks ago we wrote that Facebook will not charge users, however millions of users continue to be deceived. One Facebook group, “300,000 MEMBERS NEEDED TO STOP FACEBOOK FROM CHARGING £/$14.99 A MONTH”, has successfully attracted over 474,000 users. Another group claims Facebook will begin charging on July 1st, but it’s a flat out lie used as a way to drive thousands of users to the group.

While Facebook has systematically shut down groups spreading this false information one at a time, I’d expect the company to create a filter to prevent these groups from being created in the first place. As I wrote in December, “Facebook didn’t become the most popular site in the U.S. on Christmas by charging for their service, and they aren’t going to become the largest site in the world by charging for their service.”

This is an ongoing rumor which Facebook continues to deny, stating that their service is ad supported. To all the users who think Facebook will start charging for their service, this article is for you. It never happened before, and while Facebook could generate billions by charging for their site, it’s not going to happen. All the groups stating that Facebook will charge are nothing more than flat out lies.

source from allfacebook.com

Photobucket

Haiti before and after from satellite

Read Original





Read Original

from google blog:-

With relief efforts underway, many displaced Haitians and their friends and families around the world are deeply concerned about the safety and whereabouts of loved ones. In response to the Haitian earthquake, a team of Googlers worked with the U.S. Department of State to create an online People Finder gadget so that people can submit information about missing persons and to search the database.



You'll find this gadget on our Haiti earthquake response website as well as on the State Department website. In order to prevent the proliferation of multiple missing persons databases (a big problem during Hurricane Katrina), we've made the People Finder gadget standards-based and easily embeddable on any website (see here for instructions). The gadget is currently available in English, French and Creole.

We're also helping families in the U.S. stay connected with their loved ones in Haiti by offering free calls to Haiti for the next two weeks via Google Voice. If you don't have a Google Voice account already, request an invitation at www.google.com/voice.

For anyone interested in viewing updated imagery in Google Earth, we've now included GeoEye's shots from Wednesday in the Historical Imagery feature. Now you can view the imagery without downloading the KML file and can use the time slider to easily compare the stark before-and-after images, such as those below. To help relief organizations, GeoEye has made professional-quality files of their recent satellite imagery of Haiti downloadable via our earthquake response website. We hope the imagery in this format will be valuable to GIS organizations and aid workers.


We have also made Haiti Map Maker data publicly available for download for non-commercial use and attribution. Data can be used by relief workers to do things such as create offline maps, combine data sets and run analysis, all of which we hope will help with their efforts on the ground. Please help improve Haiti maps with Google Map Maker.

News and user footage continues to roll into YouTube. Oxfam and the American Red Cross are even responding to donations by uploading videos that show viewers exactly where their contributions are making a difference.

Posted by Jacquelline Fuller and Prem Ramaswami for the Google Crisis Response Team


Photobucket

PDFMyURL convert any website to PDF for free.

Read Original


If you just want a PDF of a given URL at a certain time, PDFmyURL gets the job done with no fuss, no muss. You can also grab the bookmarklet from the front page to pull off the conversion at any time.

1. Open PDFmyURL


2. Enter website URL, Click P button


3. Your PDF is ready


Click the "Advanced Options" on the right, though, and you'll learn how to pull off PDF production without even visiting the site, embed advanced options, and even run PDFmyURL from your own server. Neat, free stuff, and a great public service.

Create your PDF now PDFmyURL



Photobucket

Avast 5 - a new look

Read Original

by Seth Rosenblatt

Freeware antivirus Avast 5 debuts today with several new features, but longtime fans are most likely to notice that the old interface has gone to wherever interfaces go when they die. Along with the new interface, Avast Free, Avast Professional, and the new Avast Internet Security introduce an overhauled feature set that keep the suite highly competitive. Arguably, the free version provides the most complete free antivirus on the market.


The new, clean look of Avast.

(Credit: Screenshot by Seth Rosenblatt/CNET)
Before detailing the new features, the importance of this interface change can't be understated. Gone is the music player default look, which was skinnable but confusing. In its place is a sleek UI that new users should find far more manageable. The gray and orange color scheme stands out well on the screen, and the tab-based navigation on the left makes it much easier than before to navigate between features. Highlighted with the familiar security colors of green for safe and red for dangerous, the Summary tab gives up-to-date info on shield status, auto-updates, virus definitions, the program version, and whether the new silent/gaming mode is on. There's also an unobtrusive ad to Avast Internet Security.

The Summary tab contains a second sub-menu, Statistics. If you're curious to see how Avast's shields have been performing against threats, here's where you can get your math geek on. For each shield, it tells you how many files were scanned and when, and presents the data in a concise graph.

The scans live in the second tab, where you can choose and adjust six default scan types plus a custom scan option. What useful about Avast's layout here is that you can adjust all Avast-related scans from this tab. This includes the expected Quick and Full scans, but also encompasses the Removable media scan, Folder scan, Scans initiated from Windows Explorer, and the Screen Saver scan. Once you initiate a scan, you're not locked into that pane. Exploring the program interface while a scan runs doesn't kill the scan.

You can also schedule a boot-time scan and access scan logs from the scan tab. While running a scan, Avast will tell you not only how long the scan has taken and how many files have been examined, but also how much data has been tested and how fast it's being tested. As with the summary graphs, there's a lot of data that Avast exposes.


The old look of Avast 4.8 and its settings window.

(Credit: Screenshot by Seth Rosenblatt/CNET)
The Real-Time Shields live in the third tab, and again the clean interface comes into play here as navigating what could be a mess of options and tweaks is instead dead simple. Click on a shield to reveal a real-time chart of what it's been defending you against, with a Stop button and settings options at the top of the window. Another button at the top takes you to the advanced settings for that shield, while links at the bottom expose the shield's history as a graph and export a log file.

The last tab, Maintenance, contains the virus chest and manual update buttons. On the top right of the interface live the Help Center and the Settings, from which you can get much more granular control of Avast. This includes everything from toggling the system tray icon, to managing updates, to password-protecting Avast access. This is also where you can un-involve your anonymously-submitted data from Community IQ, the Avast crowd-sourced behavioral detection engine. The new Avast interface is also Aero-friendly, with Explorer-style backward and forward navigation buttons in case you can't remember where you tweaked a particular setting. If the interface turned you off before, Avast 5 is worth another look just to see how much it's improved.

The basic free version, formerly known as the Home Edition, includes an attractive and obviously affordable set of features. The antivirus, antispyware, and heuristics engines form a security core that also includes multiple real-time shields. Mail and file system shields join the pre-existing behavior, network, instant messaging, peer-to-peer, and Web shields. Other new features include a silent-gaming mode and an "intelligent scanner" that only looks at changed files after establishing a baseline.

The behavioral shield is a common-sense feature, as security software publishers leverage their large user bases to detect threats early and warn others. Avast's user base is interesting in that they're heavily involved in the support of the software, and the company claims that their mostly volunteer-run support forums see 100,000 daily visitors. This isn't surprising, though, given that Avast passed the 100 million user mark at the end of 2009.


There are several features that are only available in both the Professional and Internet Security versions. The Pro version, which comes with a single-computer license for $39.95, offers a script shield and a sandbox for isolating and testing suspected threats, without having to worry about infection. The Internet Security version gives users three licenses for $59.95, and includes a firewall and antispam measures along with the sandbox and script shield.

Efficacy testing of antivirus programs is becoming trickier as threats mutate beyond what the tests have been designed to check, but some testing is better than none. In the Whole Product Dynamic Test by independent efficacy tester AV-Comparitives in December 2009, which tested a beta version of Avast 5, the program earned an Advanced rating. Although it shared that score with six others, including Eset and the free programs from Microsoft and Avira, only two programs scored higher: Norton and Kaspersky.

In November 2009, Avast 4.8 and Microsoft Security Essentials were the only freeware to score Advanced+ in the Retrospective/Proactive Test done by AV Comparatives. It's also the only program that tested faster than Norton AntiVirus 2010, and was tied with Microsoft for second place in fewest false positives detected. The detection score was also high, at 98 percent. That's worse than Avira, but Avast noted far fewer false positives. Avast 5 Free lacks features in the paid upgrade including antispam measures, a testing sandbox, a Script shield, and a firewall. Even without those, Avast Free 5 probably the strongest, free antivirus currently available.

CNET Labs is currently performing its own tests, which will be updated here when the results are in. In an empirical real-world test, though, the Quick scan took 13 minutes, 52 seconds, while a Full scan ran about 90 minutes.

Users should also note that along with offering an opt-in to Google Chrome when installing Avast, the free version was also chosen last week to be part of the Google Pack in Europe.

While it's clear that the paid versions of Avast represent a good value, albeit not the best value, the efficacy, feature set, and ease-of-use of Avast Free make it a must-have security suite.

taken from download.com

Photobucket

Thursday, January 14, 2010

New IE hole exploited in attacks on U.S. firms

Read Original


from Download dot com by Elinor Mills

Attackers targeting Google and a host of other U.S. companies recently used software that exploits a new hole in Internet Explorer, Microsoft said Thursday.





"Internet Explorer was one of the vectors" used in the attacks that Google disclosed earlier this week, Microsoft said in a statement. "To date, Microsoft has not seen widespread customer impact, rather only targeted and limited attacks exploiting IE 6," the statement said.

The vulnerability affects Internet Explorer 6, IE 7, and IE 8 on Windows 7, Vista, Windows XP, Server 2003, Server 2008 R2, as well as IE 6 Service Pack 1 on Windows 2000 Service Pack 4, Microsoft said in an advisory on Thursday afternoon.

Google disclosed the attacks targeting it and other U.S. companies on Tuesday and said the attacks originated in China. Human rights activists who use Gmail also were targeted, Google said.

Source code was stolen from some of the more than 30 Silicon Valley companies targeted in the attack, sources said. Adobe has confirmed that it was targeted by an attack, and sources have said Yahoo, Symantec, Juniper Networks, Northrop Grumman, and Dow Chemical also were targets.

Microsoft said the vulnerability in IE exists as an invalid pointer reference and that it could allow an attacker to take control of a computer if the target were duped into clicking on a link in an e-mail or an instant message that led to a Web site hosting malware. "It could also be possible to display specially crafted Web content using banner advertisements or other methods to deliver Web content to affected systems," Microsoft said in the statement.

Microsoft is working on a fix but could not say whether it would address the issue as part of its next Patch Tuesday scheduled for February 9 or before.

Keeping the IE Internet zone security setting on "high" will protect users from the vulnerability by prompting before running ActiveX Controls and Active Scripting, Microsoft said. Customers should also enable Data Execution Prevention (DEP), which helps mitigate online attacks, the company said. DEP is enabled by default in IE 8 but must be manually turned on in earlier versions.

Microsoft acknowledged Google, Mandiant, Adobe Systems, and McAfee for working with the company and providing details on the attack.

Operation Aurora
Earlier on Thursday, McAfee CTO George Kurtz detailed the vulnerability in a blog post.

"As with most targeted attacks, the intruders gained access to an organization by sending a tailored attack to one or a few targeted individuals. We suspect these individuals were targeted because they likely had access to valuable intellectual property," Kurtz wrote. "These attacks will look like they come from a trusted source, leading the target to fall for the trap and clicking a link or file. That's when the exploitation takes place, using the vulnerability in Microsoft's Internet Explorer."

Many targeted attacks involve a "cocktail" of zero-day vulnerabilities combined with social engineering, he said. "So there very well may be other attack vectors that are not known to us at this time," he wrote.

Initially, security researchers investigating the attacks believed that a hole in Adobe Reader was a culprit, but Adobe has said that it has no evidence to suggest that a vulnerability in its technology was an attack vector.

McAfee believes the internal name attackers gave to the operation was "Aurora," which the code indicated was the directory name on the computer where the code was compiled into an executable file, said Dmitri Alperovitch, vice president of threat research at McAfee.

The attack was notable for its level of sophistication, using obfuscation techniques not typically seen in attacks on corporations, he said. It dropped about 10 different malicious files with different capabilities that were used at different stages of the infection and used crypto and other techniques to avoid detection, he added.

"The exploit itself was a piece of JavaScript code that encrypted itself and had multiple layers of encryption that got you to the executable binary code, which phoned home and then pulled an encrypted file from an external server," Alperovitch said. "That file used multiple keys for encryption and once it was decrypted it turned into an executable that dropped various modules onto the infected system."

One of the modules was a back door that phoned home to a different server and established an encrypted channel designed to avoid detection by masquerading as an Secure Sockets Layer protocol, he said. "That allowed the hackers to connect to the machine and basically take it over remotely. From then on they had a beachhead to explore the rest of the network for reconnaissance."

Asked what what type of data or areas of the network the code was programmed to look for or access, Alperovitch said "We saw the backdoor, but we did not see the capability in the malware to scan networks and locate things."

The attacks lasted about three weeks, from mid-December until January 4 and were most likely timed to coincide with the holiday season when offices would be closed or lightly staffed, he said.

In early January the command-and-control channels that the code used to receive instructions from the attackers were shut down, he said, adding, "So, we could not verify where the data was going or whether there were links to China."

He said he does not know why the command-and-control servers were shut down. They were located in Taiwan and in Texas and Illinois, he said.

"We believe this attack is a watershed moment," Alperovitch said. "We've never seen this level of sophistication on attacks targeting commercial companies that aren't affiliated with a government or the defense industrial base."

Wired initially reported the IE hole earlier on Thursday, citing an unnamed source.

Updated 7:10 p.m. PST with more details from McAfee and 3:30 p.m. PST with Microsoft advisory and details and 2:33 p.m. PST to clarify that Google, not McAfee, said attacks came from China and 1:05 p.m. PST with Microsoft comment and more details from McAfee's George Kurtz.

Click Here for Original Source
Originally posted at InSecurity Complex

Photobucket

Sunday, August 30, 2009

Americans save more, spend less. Will it last?

Read Original



Evidence of a new consumer mindset keeps piling up. Today's New York Times front page reports Americans are becoming savers. When they shop, it is for necessities. They are spending less on impulse purchases.



"We have gone in a radically short time from conspicuous consumption to conspicuous saving," Anne Brouwer senior partner at Chicago-based retail consultants McMillan/Doolitle, LLP, told me last week. "Everybody, retailers included, recognizes this is a major change -- lasting change."
As the Times reports, a patent attorney in Austin now grows her own vegetables; a Macy's saleswoman says people are running in and out of the store with only the basics they need, no more. The Times marshals evidence that this is part of a change in consumer behavior that will last after the economy gets back on its feet.

We have seen the signs out there all along: Penny pinching parents have made the back-to-school season dicey for retailers. And early indications are that the holiday season will be a hard sell, too.

Nearly every retailer reporting results for the second quarter either fell short or met Wall Street's profit expectations by cutting costs and inventory. The very few that managed to post a win, like The TJX Cos., (TJX) were stores that clearly played as the alternative to expensive stores.

The depth and width of this recession make it different than the recession-lite dip we experienced after 9-11. Then, the government asked consumers to open their wallets and give the economy a boost. Americans complied and the recession was over by the time economists finally agreed there had been one.

Not this time. Cultural mores are shifting. Being unemployed doesn't have the stigma it used to. Shopping at thrift shops now gets you admiration, not pity.

Even American youth, those self-involved champions of brand-name shopping, have not been shielded by the reality of this recession, says Brouwer. With all the media and social networks they're exposed to, they are very aware of the economic conditions and what caused this credit crunch, so they may actually grow up thriftier than their parents.

Since consumer spending makes up to three-fourths of U.S. economic activity, this cultural shift could be bad news for the economic recovery. But given that it was a credit crisis that got us in this mess, maybe learning to live within our means is a good thing.

Original Source


Photobucket

Apple, Enemy of The TV Industry??

Read Original



Is Apple the Enemy of the TV Industry? Microsoft Thinks So

Music’s long struggle with the web has been well documented. As consumers shifted from CDs to digital media, music labels, artists, and the RIAA have struggled with how to cope. While some have decided to sue consumers for $22,500 per song, others have found ways to embrace the web.

Now Microsoft’s Director of Consumer and Online in the UK predicts that the same turmoil is going to hit the television industry in the next few years. And unless the TV business “aggressively move its content online” and builds “a critical mass of content that the traditional buyers of airtime will understand and buy into,” they will face an “iTunes moment” where their online business becomes dependent on Apple.

According to The Guardian, Microsoft’s Ashley Highfield believes that TV execs have just two or three years to adapt or be thrown into chaos the music industry is currently experiencing:

“So realistically I think the industry has about two to three years to adapt or face its iTunes moment. And it will take at least that long for media brands to build credible, truly digital brands. But, importantly, I do believe TV does have a small two to three year window in which to respond.”

More than anything, Mr. Highfield believes that TV needs to find ways to generate significant revenue from online video and to make it easy for advertisers to buy ads in bulk for online TV. He also strongly suggested that the TV industry aggressively move its content online, on its own terms.

It’s interesting that it is a Microsoft exec making these suggestions and mentioning Apple as the online enemy of the TV industry. We can see his logic though: you don’t want one company to dominate online sales like Apple does with music in the iTunes store. The music industry’s been between a rock and a hard place for a long time now.

However, we think there are a lot of flaws to Highfield’s logic. TV doesn’t make its revenues based on sales, as the music industry does, but by advertising – something that is both effective and measurable on the web. We’ve also seen TV more readily embrace the web successfully, most notably with Hulu.

So yes, TV needs to embrace the online world or suffer losing control over its content distribution. However, the television industry is already light years ahead of the recording industry in that regard.

Original Source here

Photobucket